This blog consists mostly of common sense responses to happenings (news articles, political events, etc) that just cry out for someone to say "WHOA! Hang on a second, here!" Too many people get away with just inventing their own facts as they bull-rush their way through an argument.

Unless you're dodging a taxicab or sidestepping a falling gargoyle, it's usually wise to take what time is available to evaluate and apply actual common sense. Good, old wisdom. It is, of course, my opinion, but I'll try to show why I think it's factual.
Thomas Paine said, "To argue with someone who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead." ... but I argue with drunks, egomaniacs, anti-gun Statists, Socialist/Keynesians and climate-fraud peddlers, too.

**PLEASE share this around. I didn't research, consider, write and post this junk just to have it hidden.
And feel free to comment.**

CONTACT SophosArchaeus: eMail at sophosarchaeus@hushmail.com
NOTE: this page does not endorse violence, racism or threats, nor permit such abuse in any direction.
Though Americans are fully able to end a fight, that is a last-resort, defense-only option.
If you're here for such crap, get the hell off my page!]

Monday, October 28, 2013

Here we go AGAIN again gain ain ainainain[loop].

[ED: Source links in progress]
Socialists know so much BETTER than you do what is best for you and your family.

Over 4 years ago, Obamacare was imposed upon the lower (i.e. non-political) class as a non-tax, “affordable” healthcare system, using bribes, threats and secret deals, despite objections of a proven 51%+ of Americans. Government ‘healthcare’ had already failed everywhere it was tried in the world. We knew back then that it was unsustainable and dangerous and many said so.  But Obama and the other “ProgressiveDemocrats called us names and laughed that “we have to pass it to find out what’s in it”.  What's in it sucksThey embezzled $600 Billion from Medicare to redistribute as "free" care to those who were not paying for their own, free, guaranteed, emergency room treatment to start with.  Obama promised over and over that the millions of plans now declared 'inadequate' under Obamatax could be kept "no matter what".   Oh, and by the way, Obamatax was "Hillarycare" (you know, Hillary "I am a Progressive" Socialist Clinton) before it was Obamacare.  And the salient provisions of Hillaryobamatax were in dusty, dog-eared files of the Progressive Socialists for decades before Americans refused to be fooled by Clinton. Socialized or "Single Payer" medicine has been Leftists' golden fleece ('fleece' as in scam, victimize or con) for 100 years.  Thus Hillaryobamacare, which loads down private care and the cost of exaggerated coverage and unlimited delivery until our world's best private system collapses and the government must "save us" by taking total control of 1/6 of our economy and making us dependent for our very health and lives.  But then, older men do get (at exorbitant cost) gynecological and breast exam coverage while kids get geriatrics and old women get pediatric dentistry, and other "innovative" Progressive concepts.
Ah, but Obama didn't know anything about it until he read about it in the papers.

A packed Supreme Court (2 justices had previously worked in favor of Obamatax, thus making them biased and requiring their recusal, but they didn’t bother with Constitutionality or legality) issued history's only 4-1-4 ruling.  Fourruled it was 'Constitutional' despite the reality of the limits of American Constitutional government; four rejected the ideological double-talk and fabrications; and the Chief Justice ignored Obama’s own words and confirmed it as a Senate-created'tax’, despite Constitutional requirements that all taxes originate in theHouse of Representatives.  Thus, government may order We the People to do anything it wants.  Oh, and by the way, Roosevelt(D) used a packed Supreme Court to impose  what he called Social Security "Insurance" on us for 80 years.  It was never ethically or legally structured as insurance (i.e. enough input to cover possible output) then, and what is actually a  Ponsi Scheme has been teetering on the edge of collapse for decades.  Most of those now working will never see any of the money that was extracted from their paychecks, let alone full value.  It has already been 'distributed', you see, and only ever-increasing taxation keeps it afloat.

OH! And now, Sebelieus and Obama have secretly 'decided' [a power reserved to the Attorney General in the short term and the Supreme Court for permanence] that Federal anti-corruption laws "dont apply" to the entire HillaryObamatax system, its subsidiaries, designers, executors, enforcers, beneficiaries, cronies, profiteers....

But then, I'm sure Obama "just heard about it".

Having increased debt by $7 Trillion in 4 years (more than all previousPresidents combined), Obama announced weeks before "the shutdown" [actually only a 17% reduction in operations] that he would “not negotiate” (with the co-equal branches of government) over the Federal budget or debt.  He demanded unlimited spending and uncontrolled government.  Some House Republicans tried to resist, and protect the now 71% of People (85% already had the insurance they wanted) want HillaryObamatax overhauled or replaced.  They were called “terrorists", "criminals", "extortionists", "arsonists” and other respectful and civil things (while the Progressive Obama regime does negotiate with actual Jihadist mass murderers and rogue-Statenuke and chemical violators).  Senate Dictator - er, Majority Leader - Harry Reid(D) refused to allow even debate, let alone votes, on amendments or  House bills offered to the Senate.

But remember, Obama doesn't know anything about that.

Obama violated "the law of the land" and  excused businesses from the law to provide insurance, but individuals dependent on those businesses for their insurance are still mandated to get it. He and his HHS Czar Sebelius also excused their own families, cronies, Leftist Unions, and a few others in the political class.  The web architect warned last spring that the system did not work and had no "I.D. theft" protection for our personal data.  Sebelius has now (round II of hearings) even admitted (under terrific pressure from GOP Senatorial investigators) that 'some felons might be collecting' your personal data and being paid by the taxpayer to do it. But Hillaryobamatax has been unleashed

And Obama knows nothing about the website, which is the "easy part".

Oh, by the way, the promised "just like making an airplane or hotel reservation" Hillaryobamtax Exchange website aint quite so.  It seems that word got out about how (except in a couple of crony Blue States) the prices were much higher in the Exchanges.  So, just a couple weeks before the rollout, Executive Orders were decreed, removing the "price browsing" or "window-shopping" ability of potential clients until AFTER they had committed, signing up for coverage. And a cute little caveat was discovered in the source code for the site.  It seems that your computer can read it to you if you know how to ask, but it is invisible on the Obamatax site itselfThe one that has been 99% impenetrable.  It says that "You have no reasonable expectation of privacy regarding any communication or data transiting or stored on this information system." Pretty cool, considering that warnings were sounded about vulnerability to I.D. theft (YOUR identity) a year ago, as the "navigator" operators were never vetted for drugs, criminal backgrounds or even current warrantsAlso, in shades of IRS/NSA/DOJ/DEA/EPA/DNC gang-persecuting of conservative American Citizens without probable cause, it adds, "At any time, and for any lawful government purpose, the government may monitor, intercept, and search and seize any communication or data transiting or stored on this information system." Hm, what ever happened to, "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized" ~ IV-A?

But former adjunct "Constitutional Law professor" Obama wouldn't know anything about that.

Google,  Apple, Amazon and other servers each handle billions of transactions per week.  Progressives said that 30 million must be enrolled into Hillaryobamatax and paid $600 million to foreign web designers.   But in 3 weeks, only 9.5 million even visited the site.  Only 3.5 million tried to ‘register’ for information.  Only 1.3 million succeeded.  Hearing about the terrifying increases (200-400% on premiums, 200-300% in copays and deductibles), only 36 thousand actually enrolled. Oh, and by the way, HHS techs admit that the "window shopping" ability was ordered out of the website just weeks before the rollout, making the discovery of those unaffordable prices difficult for those who don't watch FOX.  Even the poor must pay 12% of total income before any subsidies kick in.  Site traffic has dropped by 88%, obviating the Left's constant drumbeat that 'millions are frantic to lay hands on affordable healthcare'..  NY Times, CNN, NBC and other latecomers now confirm that thesystem is simply unworkable and the plan is stunningly unaffordable.   A few “Republicans” supported the Left in the efforts to slow or stop Hillaryobamacare and debt increases via negotiation.  They pushed responsibility back a few weeks, ensuring that we have to pay more and then re-fight all this again in January.

But Obama won't know anything about any of that "technical" stuff.

Progressives reversed all the facts about not only Hillaryobamatax, but the economic issues; including their fabricated threats of "default” if the debt limit was not raised without restriction.  That could not happen, since government already takes in 10 times our payment obligations even without an increase.  So, all that is needed is to pay bills and cover Federal Responsibilities before giving away any more billions to cronies, foreign companies, Illegal Aliens and freebies.  The GOP House pre-passed several bills to reduce negative impacts (before and after the "Slimdown"), but the Leftist Executive branch issued orders to intentionally ignore or mis-interpret all of them to maximize pain to the People. The 17% reduction of non-essential personnel when the budget was delayed was called “total Shutdown” by the Left (DNC and/or GOP).  Executive Orders were issued to rent and place barricades, then guard them to deny We the People access to our own monuments.  DOD appointees denied death benefits for service members and their families.  These were unreported or reverse-reported by most media.  Obama and the Progressives crowed about “winning” the political fight, accuse Conservatives of “brinksmanship and extremism” and make ridiculous claims of “cutting debt” while spending more of our grand children’s money.  Obama claims that slightly limiting his massive increases is “the biggest cut in the deficit in history” and now it is time to re-re-re-revisit confiscatory taxes on the evil rich, Illegal Alien amnesty and Second Amendment infringement.

And now, it turns out that, "...if you like your insurance/plan/doctor, you can keep it, PERIOD" or, "...you can keep it, NO MATTER WHAT", has an asterisk (*).  [No, a BIG asterisk.]

Now for the switcheroo.
* [...well, that's a little better.  Try again.]

[...now you got it.]
Witness actual, Socialist, "REVISIONIST HISTORY" in the making:
However, Obama keeps telling us "liars" and "teabaggers" to remain civil and let him do as he wishes "under the Constitution."

And keep in mind, here:
Richard Nixon was hounded out of office [resigned when confronted by the Liberal media] solely on the strength of the charge that he "lied to the American People" (about his knowledge of a 4th rate, 'political tricks' burglary of a DNC office to find information about his opponant).  No one was killed, no treasury losses were incurred, no American jobs were lost.
Bill Clinton was impeached [brought to trial] solely over the fact that he "lied to the American People" (about having sex with a staffer in our Oval Office).  No one was killed, no treasury losses were incurred, no American jobs were lost.
Obama has presided over the implementation and coverup of HillaryObamatax as well as Benghazi, Fast and Furious, "Stimulus" embezzlement and waste, 14% unemployment/underemployment, weaponized IRS attacks on Conservatives, wholesale spying on innocent Americans, etc, etc.

Now, Harry Reid tells us that we need more taxes (than the highest revenues in history) and that "everyone wants to pay more".  Still no progress on responsibility (or even 'transparency') for the "old business Secret Service scandal, the G.S.A. scandals, the Stimulus diversion/embezzlement scandals, the Fast and Furious scandal (and illegal use of Executive Privilege), the EPA scandals, the Benghazi scandal (and the lies told over the victim's bodies), the I.R.S (and DEA, FBI, DOJ...) scandals, the NSA scandals, the 15% unemployment/underemployment scandal....
...Oh, and by the way, it is once again "Republicans fault" and even "Bush's fault".

But its not Obama's fault.  After all, he knew "nothing about it", but proclaimed as PotUS that "the police acted stupidly".  And he was unaware until it was on the media, but the "President of all the people" saw a proven felony-assault "son" in Martin.  He was busy sleeping and fund-raising and repeated over and over that Benghazi must be some kind of "video", even over the bodies of the victims.  He had no clue at all that thousands of guns were issued by his Attorney General to foreign narco-terrorists.  He is, however, the most savvy consumer of intelligence in history, and really doesn't need those pesky and under-informed intelligence briefings with their boring binders full of expert data.  Can't get good help, I guess.

Friday, June 14, 2013

OUR Government

I want to be clear.  SophosArchaeus has written reams of supported and footnoted facts calling out the usurper Left [and those that claim to be 'Conservative', 'Republican', 'Libertarian' et al, but are actually Progressive or Anarchist] that is currently "leading" our country into the ground.  But this is not to say that I "hate the government".

I love OUR government.  Our government is Constitutional and Representative.  Our government is of, by and for the People.  Our government is only as big as it must be and only tries to do what it has the authority and need to do.  I want our government [and by extension, our military and Law Enforcement] to have all the advantages.  I want them to have the latest, strongest, biggest, fastest, toughest, most devastating and one-sided weapons, intelligence and manpower in human history... 
...and restraint and integrity rather than arrogance and political-class narcissism.  And, first and foremost, the People who lend some of their power to the Representative, Constitutional government demand that every member of that government acknowledge and hold themselves constrained in a few things:

...that Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. ~ 1st Amendment;
...that the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. ~ 2nd Amendment;
...that the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. ~ 4th Amendment;
...that in all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence. ~ 6th Amendment;
...that the enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. ~ 9th Amendment;
...and that among those dozens of other rights [given by our Creator and not issued nor revocable by any politician or bureaucrat] and powers [granted by We, the People], it is our government (especially the Feds) that is limited, while the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. ~ 10th Amendment.

When our "representatives" recall that they may tax and expend only a minimal amount of our money, only pass or enforce laws that are absolutely necessary within their power and equally binding upon them as upon the rest of us, then they will once again be an American government.  Until then, too many of them are simply a greedy, dishonest gaggle of foreign-style, class-war mongering, anti-American usurpers [see: Traitor, n.].

Friday, January 25, 2013

Real 'safety', and 'child protection' vs political games [UPDATED]

Please, just for a moment, let’s deal in reality and drop the Liberal posturing for a moment, in favor of actual safety for Americans and not on failed restriction or confiscation schemes.  The law of the Land is, “A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”

The Second Amendment guarantees all law abiding Citizens the right to own and carry effective guns without undue interference.  The Supreme Court has repeatedly affirmed this right (last time was in 2010), with limitations on machine guns and prohibition of impractical WMDs.  Lets face it, there is just no ability to practice or defend one’s self with artillery or bombers.  All of our Founders agreed with the meaning in their writings.  George Mason, co-author of the Amendment, wrote that “the Militia is the whole People”.  But then as now, people had the right to defend as well as to feed themselves.

[Scroll, if you will to the top of this blog page.  See that photo of the peace-loving, faithful, working man, leaving his plow and coat in order to "move to the sound of the guns" with his own musket?  SophosArchaeus went to the Old North Bridge, along the Battle Road near Concord to take his photo. He does not want to lose a days' work to look for trouble.  He does not want to risk his life or health in combat, possibly leaving his family to lose the farm their grandfather cleared.  But he has heard the drums or bells or shots, or been summoned by the rider with news.  UnAmerican troops are approaching to take his family's and neighbor's Liberty, and he will not allow that to happen.  He will stand between the violent, greedy enemy and the country he loves.]

Its important to note that this basic concept has been successful in America for well over 350 years; first as English common law (before the insane "train of abuses" of George III showed the flaw in government not "of the People") and then as a broad, absolute, guaranteed freedom for the last 236 yearsThere have always been and always will be the insane, smugglers, criminals, 'savages' (of any race), tyrants and others that will mis-use arms.  These dangerous miscreants are not an excuse to limit the rights of the Law Abiding, but rather the reason for strengthening their defenses.  Historically, where the People are disarmed, crime and tyranny flourish.

Well regulated” means 'self-disciplined' and ‘practiced for effectiveness', not brass buttons or Government chains of command.  Since it was intended primarily as the People’s defense against Government usurpation of the People’s power, asserting that it must be subject to the government is just senseless.  Sheer revisionism.  Mason also used the unrestrictive term “arms”, rather than ‘musket’ (or the superior, civilian Pennsylvania Rifle) to ensure ongoing parity with the infantry.   TheRight is not primarily for ‘deer hunting’ but “security” or self-defense; and that primarily against governmental tyranny such as America had just thrown off in gaining Independence.  Jefferson wrote that “the beauty of the Second Amendment is that
it will not be needed until they try to take it.”  

Regarding “gun freezones”. What is never mentioned in the mainstream media is that every recent attacker specifically chose the most gun-restrictive venue available to him, in order to avoid resistance.  These include Liberal Statesor cities, “no guns” malls, Army posts (where private guns [especially concealed ones] are prohibited andall weapons are kept in safes, except for the few issued to on-duty security), etc.   They intentionally sought out the only “No Guns” theater out of seven that were showing “Batman” at midnight inAurora; an all-female staffed, posted “Gun Free” School in gun-restrictive Connecticut; and a Liberal rally in Centrist Tucson, in otherwise Conservative Arizona, et al.  It should be obvious that criminals ignore laws by definition, whether gun restrictions or murder.  Each of them surrendered or committed suicide immediately upon hearing sirens or seeing any armed Citizen. For example, the un-sung Colorado mall shopper who drew but never fired his concealed pistol, just before the shooter stopped killing and shot himself.  More Americans are shot in gun-hating Chicagothan Afghanistan. Most of anti-gun, Socialist Europe has higher violent crime andmurder rates than most of the U.S. (the exceptions are the big, anti-gun cities), despite the false “stats” claimed by the Left.

The term “assault weapon” is dishonest; invented for political deceit.  This is what Eric Holder wanted when he advocated “brainwashing” Americans against guns in his 1995 speech for gun control.  There simply is no such gun designation.  Only their bolt-on, military-lookingaccessories define so-called assault weapons; the trigger, the barrel and the bullet remain the sameas a single-shot antique.  The true designation is compact rifle or “carbine”.  Black paint, flashlight holders, pistol grips, etc have no effect on deadliness, but look scary to some.  A carbine is simply more sensible than its longer cousins in confined home defense or for hunting in a thicket.  “Semi-auto” or “Assault Weapon” sounds like a machine gun, but these rifles require one decision and trigger-pull for each bullet, just like a revolver.  One of “Screamer Cuomo’s” ‘deer rifles’ actually has more deadly power and range than a little, black carbine.  These carbines were banned before in the 1990’s, but violent crime actually went up, so the unconstitutional law was scrapped.  The Virginia Tech murderer (largest number of victims of all) used many, ‘low capacity’ pistol magazines, while others used only diesel fuel or box cutters for their mass murders. Since street gangs and Illegal Aliendrug smugglers have fully-automatic MAC-10s and AK-47s (which are already illegal without a very expensive, strict Class III license), why shouldlaw-abiding Americans be the only ones restricted to ‘7 or 10 bullets’, or to ‘bolt-action only’?  What makes us “safer”by being intentionally out-gunned?

Please note that, while gun ownership has risen dramatically in the last few years, violent and gun crimes have dropped over the same period, despite the tragedies (which are mis-represented in the press).  More guns, less crime! They never report the over 5,000 crimes every day (per FBI statistics and university studies) that are thwarted by lawful gun owners; usually without firing a shot.  Some papers choose instead to print the private information of the lawful gun owners, resulting in targeted burglaries for guns.  Sen. Feinstein’s (D) unconstitutional, proposed law would protect the release of this information rather than American lives. 

Obama’s 23 illegal “Executive Orders” and Feinstein’s illegal, confiscatory, hypocritical scheme would have done nothing, NOTHING, to change the outcome of any of the recent (or previous) attacks.  For example, the Sandy Hook shooter was not a gun purchaser or owner.  He murdered his own mother and took her self-defense weapons.  Its obvious that laws against murder were no concern of his, just as "Gun Free" zones weren't. Whether he actually used the rifle is arguable: it was seen to be removed from the trunk of the shooter’s car, in the parking lot, after the shooting was over.  Yet a “coroner” in a white coat (very much like those issued by the White House at Obama’s Health Care press conference) clearly stated (before the bodies were removed, let alone autopsied) that “all”of the wounds were from an Assault Weapon. 

Dead last on Obama’s “to usurp” list is a ‘National dialogue about mental health’.  Perhaps, if Left-Leaning mental health pros did not hide their patients’ increasingly violent status from the authorities (and therefore, gun-licensing procedure) one or two of the obviously insane shooters might have been under detention, or the few that actually bought guns, denied.  But does anyone actually believe that “National dialogue” will result in a universal move to honest reporting of mental illness?  By the way, not one of the guns used in these tragedies was bought at the Progressive’s bane: the evil, non-reporting “Gun Show”.

Meanwhile, Leftists (who care nothing about the Constitutional Rights that make America exceptional, or actually despise and connive against them) rail about their imaginary 'gun show loophole' and demand "universal record checks".  By this, they mean record making: recording every gun-related transaction and the buyer's information.  The Left continues to refuse to report the psychotically dangerous to the existing Federal system, while the N.R.A. devised and suggested - YEARS AGO - an instant background check for gun shows.  Simply run the I.D. of a potential buyer, and get a green light (no felony record and no clinical insanity) or red light (no record or a problem with the record).  No reported sale or type of sale, no invasion of privacy, yet  avoidance of arming someone who should not have access.  But the lie of "NRA opposing background checks" continues.

UPDATE: Please watch this excellent statement by a Sandyhook parent, who considers the "lock down" of children inside a "Gun Free Zone" school that is under attack by ANY armed madman to be a DEATH TRAP.
As to our most precious asset: our children.  While private property owners should have the right to regulate guns on their property (as they do in most pro-gun States), for goodness sake, take down the “Gun Free Zone” targets!  All these signs do is advertize to attackers that the occupants are defenseless against them.  Only the law-abiding will make any effort to honor the signs.  The anti-gun movie stars, rich bankers and Progressive Socialist “representatives” all have their own guns and/or squads of heavily armed guards.  Why not let retired cops and soldiers (or trained volunteer parents and teachers), armed and supervised by Police School Resource Officers, protect our schoolchildren?

Why do Leftists call the concept of defending children (which has been in massacre-free practice for many years in many locales) “more guns on the street”?  Why do they seek to politicize and demonize the Law Abiding, rather than take effective action to protect the innocent?

 - - - - 

- - - -
Further update:
As of 2-6-13, a whacked out, racist, Leftist, anti-gun freak (who was fired from L.A.P.D. in 1995) is terrorizing SoCal.  This insane, anti-American murderer blamed his firing on everyone else in sight.  Then he murdered or attempted to murder many of those involved, but started his spree with the innocent daughter of the officer that tried to defend him, her uninvolved fiance, and unaware officers from uninvolved departments.

Christopher Dorner, Male, Black, 33, 5'11", 270, has military and police training, considered armed and extremely dangerous.
Dorner left a 'manifesto' after murdering three and attempting several more.  He starts out by claiming victim-hood because in first grade, another kid called him a racial name; the other kid got a swat, but Dorner also got a 'completely unjustified, racist, unfair, demeaning swat' for punching and kicking the other kid!  Now he says he only has problems with all "Caucasians", "Blacks" (who treat Caucasians in ways he considers inappropriate), Hispanics, Asians, anyone that gets in his way and those who try to "get along".  By becoming a mass-murderer, he gets his chance to "clear his name".  No issues there.

Dorner is obviously very dangerous and had prepared for years, with dodges and distractions and taunts about his superiority to everyone else with DNA.  He is obviously an extremely narcissistic, disturbed ego-maniac.  He is way too dramatically convinced of his god-like superiority and cut-and-paste skills with nifty Spec-Ops terms (used correctly about 1/3 of the time).  He rants mindlessly against all guns in the hands of civilians, especially mis-described ARs which he imagines were used in all the wrong crimes (like where only pistols with standard magazines were used).  He imagines himself to be a combination of Dr Moriarty, Xerxes, Napoleon and MLK.  Its more like George III, Caligula, Hitler and Jim Jones.

He gets nothing right, yet since he is dedicated to blind obedience to Obama and the confiscation of ARs for self defense while he murders all and sundry with the semi-auto and Class III weapons he claims to have lied to "buy legally".  He ends up being the single best argument for Citizens purchasing an AR (and a shotgun and a pistol) in recent history.

Now effectively and famously defeated by honest, brave, everyday Fish and Game officers and other Oath-Keeping and duty-bound Law Enforcement officers, Dorner has finally "cleared his name".  It is, "rabid, diseased, racist, narcissist murderer".  Despite this reality, too many on the Left actually lionize the monster and excuse or even endorse his monstrosity.